A college president called me about having a workshop at his school.
They are
looking at a potential large enrollment drop following the
end of the first semester. He said he wanted me to only focus on the
positive aspects of the school’s customer service. “I always believe in
focusing on the good. What we do well. Use that as a basis to build.”
“Ahhh”
I replied. “There is part of your problem right there. You need to
focus on the negatives. On what students are complaining about. We
need to set up a system that encourages students to complain.”
He
was aghast. “You want us to get our students to complain? But that
will just encourage them to be unhappy and focus on the negatives.
Besides, I don’t need more problems. I want fewer of them.”
“Exactly
the reason to elicit as many complaints as you can.” I replied. “You
cannot fix a problem until you know about it. If you aren’t aware of
issues, they sit there, fester, grow and then explode in attrition
rates. You need to get as many complaints as you can get. Then check
into them.”
“To
see if they are valid before we go ahead and fix the issue” the
president asserted quite presidentially. “No sense putting time and
money into an issue if it’s not a real problem. I mean just because a
student says something is so doesn’t make it so”
“NO.” I empathetically responded. “If a student thinks it is a problem, it is. If it is only a problem for that student, it is still a problem even if only for that student. Keep in mind that if that student is unhappy, has a complaint. He or she may well get to the point of saying goodbye. That’s how attrition rates get up there. Individual students decide to leave.”
“But if I send a lot of time on one student, I’m not sure that’s an efficient use of resources. Shouldn’t we doa survey
or something and see how a larger group of students feel about things.
What if that student is wrong and a change makes others unhappy?”
“NO.” I empathetically responded. “If a student thinks it is a problem, it is. If it is only a problem for that student, it is still a problem even if only for that student. Keep in mind that if that student is unhappy, has a complaint. He or she may well get to the point of saying goodbye. That’s how attrition rates get up there. Individual students decide to leave.”
“But if I send a lot of time on one student, I’m not sure that’s an efficient use of resources. Shouldn’t we do
“Okay,
first off, if one student complains about something, it is likely that
others feel the same way. They just haven’t said anything. And at the
very least, they have heard of the problem and will give it credence
since it came from a fellow student. Complaints are Malthusian after
all. The complainer tells another and another and the “anothers” tell
yet others and so on. So they need to be dealt with.” Then I added
“But first you need to develop a way to flush out the complaints”
“I see. We have a student satisfaction survey
we’ve used before. Our VP of Students developed it with her staff. We
generally do well on it so maybe there just aren’t that many issues out
there.”
“Well,
maybe there aren’t. Surveys can be used as a starting point but they
need to be developed by someone who does not have a vested interest in
the answers. Your student services group may be the best in the
country but I hope you can see that they could have a vested interest
in the results. They could have, subconsciously of course, devised
items, topics and issues that would lead to certain types of responses.
You need someone who is detached from the results. Who is interested
only in getting valid results. I can make some recommendations of good
people if you like.” Didn’t want him to think I was saying this simply
to try and get some more work.
We
discussed some consultants and then went on to some other methods of
gathering complaints such as comment cards like the Applegrams at Lansing (MI) Community College, or
an email address set up just for complaints, or even better, a blog to
discuss issues students have. I mentioned that in any of these or
other methods, they should not be anonymous if at all possible.
“But will students give their names?” he questioned.
“Some will, some won’t but if you can get a name,
it is always better. First you set up a community. Second, names
provide a level of integrity to the issue. And third, you have someone
to get back to with a solution or a description of the review and
resolution of the issue.” I let the pause of silence by note taking go
by and continued.
“You’ll
want to always acknowledge the complaint. Best to do so in a way that
can let others know of it so they can join into the discussion. But
also to let them know you are taking the issues seriously.” I added.
“But
that will broadcast any problems. That’ll tell everyone we have
issues. Won’t that just multiply the problems and hurt our image.”
“Only
if you don’t respond to and don’t resolve the problems. If the school
accepts it’s not yet perfect and let’s students know what they already
know, you will get honesty points. Then when you resolve the complaint
and publicly let everyone know you did and what you did, that makes the
school a hero.” His “ahh” let me know to go on.
“The
research is clear that when a business, in this case a school owns up
to an issue and solves it to the customer’s benefit, you turn a
complainer into a supporter. Maybe even an advocate. Let the issue
stay out there and fester and you could create a group of insurgents
dedicated to hurting the school by exploding their complaints to
everyone they can reach.”
For further discussion of the benefits of complaints, contact me or
just wait for more postings. If you know of any other complaint
gathering ideas or stories of how handling a complaint turned a
potential insurgent into an advocate, let us all hear.
If this article has value for you, you'll want to get a copy of the best-selling book The Power of Retention by clicking here.
info@GreatServiceMatters.com
413.219.6939
No comments:
Post a Comment